Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Fucking Bouteflika

Most of the time I speak about international politics, terrorists, Bush, seduction, and such non-sense. Once in a while though, I must speak about the title of this Blog: THE SAHARA.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Western Sahara is an integral part of Morocco. It is Moroccan, its inhabitants are Moroccan, it is recognized as Moroccan by Moroccans on both sides of the "divide". The Sahara is not an independent country. It is MOROCCO.

But my dear Mr. Bouteflika, President of Algeria, puppet of its generals, hypocrit-asshole-truthless-piece of shit, I claim that the puppet Sahrawi Republic you have created with the help of Libya in 1976 is pure propaganda. It is bullshit. You will never take it from Morocco. I swear that. Am I clear? I swear to God that the Western Sahara will forever remain an integral part of Morocco, loyal to the Moroccan Monarchy that has to this day protected it as much as any part of Morocco.

Do not tell me that a "country" twice the size of Greece with a population of less than 700,000 is a real country. Especially if ~95% of it recognizes itself as Moroccan. Besides, how do you run a country with as few people, especially if a lot of them are Bedwin, thus nomadic tribes who travel from here to there? How do you defend it? What kind of a country do you make with a population the size of a neighborhood? Bullshit.

There are numerous reasons for Algeria supporting the Sahrawi Republic, and none of them actually benefit the people there. First of all, there's the fact that by continuing to support the Sahrawi Republic you continue to infuriate Morocco, which means your generals can continue to use the threat of war to enrich themselves. Second of all there's the fact that you have no access to the Atlantic, and by creating a puppet-state in the Western Sahara you would gain direct access to the Atlantic without passing through Morocco. Third, there's the fact that you consider yourselves Socialist, and thus enemies of the "imperialist" Monarchy in Morocco. But Algeria is no more socialist than America. It is a Military Oligarchy, which thrives on fear and the threat of war to enrich itself. Finally, the fourth reason is the fact that you have committed so much money, international humiliation, and official support to the Western Sahara that it would be a travesty, a complete disgrace, for you to backtrack and admit your error. Your population would ask you: "What do you mean? For 30 years you've used our tax and petrol money to prop up a state that you now give up on?" You can't afford that.

But listen to me well, get your eyes close to the screen, open them wide, pay close attention: OVER MY DEAD BODY. Never will any other flag except the red and green star fly over a house or building in the Western Sahara.

Algerian brothers, I have nothing against you. Our past is mixed, we helped ourselves achieve independence, we quarreled over a few cities, you got all of them. But when we meet, whether for a soccer game or dinner, we realize we are all brothers. We have a shared past, we sing the same songs, we pray to the same God, we even riot together in France.

But your leaders... Bordel. Vous pouvez aller vous la mettre la ou je pense. Tu piges?

Personne ne touche au Maroc.

1 Comments:

Blogger Ze Boss said...

I don't really see anything concrete in what Mr. Mulad Said said. Morocco lost more soldiers to Polisario's camps than vice-versa, and Polisario is based in Algeria and is funded by Algeria.

Most of the infrastructure in the Western Sahara today is directly the result of the Moroccan government investing in it, not the Polisario or Algeria. Some remains from the pre-1976 infrastructure that Spain left.

In this age of "peace", "dialogue", and "compromise" people just take it for granted that everything should be discussed. But there is no reason why Morocco should even have to discuss an integral part of its territory simply because a group of money-lured renegades claim so. Morocco is willing to give a large extent of autonomy to the Western Sahara, something that other regions of the country don't have. But complete autonomy or freedom is bullshit. Especially because the people there are Moroccan, consider themselves Moroccan, and are protected by Morocco.

AS for the representative of Cuba... I laugh. God bless Cubans, but those who work with Castro should have long stopped speaking.

Mr. Mulad Said is just another politician, who says his side of the story and claims to be right. But the detention conditions in the Tindouf camp, where Moroccans were held, some for more than 25 YEARS, are far worse than he would care to explain. Moroccan survivors of both Tindouf and Guantanamo met. It seems that Tindouf still has the upper hand in terms of horridness.

Besides, if Morocco only had a problem with Polisario (a group originally armed by Spain and funded by Libya and Algeria) that wouldn't be the same issue. But Algeria's backing of the situation is illogical. This doesn't concern Algeria in any way. If Algeria had always minded its own business, the money Morocco spent on Defense could have been used more wisely. As in to aid in the development of a region.

My question is: if there was an issue between Moroccans and Moroccans, why does Algeria intercede? The answer is, if it hadn't intercede, there would be no issue.

21:13  

Post a Comment

<< Home